<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Return of the Matte (Lipstick, that is)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://divaliciousblog.com/2007/10/25/return-of-the-matte-lipstick-that-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://divaliciousblog.com/2007/10/25/return-of-the-matte-lipstick-that-is/</link>
	<description>divalicious® serves up style, with a side of attitude – covering beauty, fashion, girly gadgets, hot spots and mostly, big personality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:45:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ldiva</title>
		<link>http://divaliciousblog.com/2007/10/25/return-of-the-matte-lipstick-that-is/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ldiva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 04:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldiva.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/return-of-the-matte-lipstick-that-is/#comment-211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poppy King, formerly of Poppy Cosmetics and undisputed queen of the matte lip, has introduced a line of matte GLOSSES under her new Lipstick Queen brand. Interesting concept to say the least.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poppy King, formerly of Poppy Cosmetics and undisputed queen of the matte lip, has introduced a line of matte GLOSSES under her new Lipstick Queen brand. Interesting concept to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luciee</title>
		<link>http://divaliciousblog.com/2007/10/25/return-of-the-matte-lipstick-that-is/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luciee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldiva.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/return-of-the-matte-lipstick-that-is/#comment-20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just wanted to say thank you, cause I really wanted a matte lip color and your blog really helped!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say thank you, cause I really wanted a matte lip color and your blog really helped!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCB</title>
		<link>http://divaliciousblog.com/2007/10/25/return-of-the-matte-lipstick-that-is/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SCB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldiva.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/return-of-the-matte-lipstick-that-is/#comment-7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, thanks LDiva, I don&#039;t want any pink undertones, I&#039;m definitely a Stripdown kind of girl!  You just saved me some $$ - THANKS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, thanks LDiva, I don&#8217;t want any pink undertones, I&#8217;m definitely a Stripdown kind of girl!  You just saved me some $$ &#8211; THANKS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ldiva1</title>
		<link>http://divaliciousblog.com/2007/10/25/return-of-the-matte-lipstick-that-is/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ldiva1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldiva.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/return-of-the-matte-lipstick-that-is/#comment-5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MAC Stripdown is definitely a tawny light-medium brown.  Chanel Nude is a creamier, darker neutral that has a hint of metallic (when compared against Stripdown although not detectable on the lip).  Chanel Nude has more bronze than brown, with a pink undertone.  It does not live in the world of bubble-gum or fuscia pink by any means.  It is more comparable to MAC Spice than Stripdown.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAC Stripdown is definitely a tawny light-medium brown.  Chanel Nude is a creamier, darker neutral that has a hint of metallic (when compared against Stripdown although not detectable on the lip).  Chanel Nude has more bronze than brown, with a pink undertone.  It does not live in the world of bubble-gum or fuscia pink by any means.  It is more comparable to MAC Spice than Stripdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCB</title>
		<link>http://divaliciousblog.com/2007/10/25/return-of-the-matte-lipstick-that-is/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SCB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldiva.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/return-of-the-matte-lipstick-that-is/#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Divalicious-ness:  I have a question, I currently use MAC Stripdown lip liner, how does the Chanel Nude compare?  I detest anything pink, prefer a tawny, browny color.  Thanks, SCB  :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Divalicious-ness:  I have a question, I currently use MAC Stripdown lip liner, how does the Chanel Nude compare?  I detest anything pink, prefer a tawny, browny color.  Thanks, SCB  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

